Phage therapy or viral phage therapy is the therapeutic use of bacteriophages to treat pathogenicbacterial infections. Phage therapy has many potential applications in human medicine as well as dentistry, veterinary science, and agriculture. If the target host of a phage therapy treatment is not an animal, the term “biocontrol” (as in phage-mediated biocontrol of bacteria) is usually employed, rather than “phage therapy”.
Bacteriophages are much more specific than antibiotics. They are typically harmless not only to the host organism, but also to other beneficial bacteria, such as the gut flora, reducing the chances of opportunistic infections. They have a high therapeutic index, that is, phage therapy would be expected to give rise to few side effects. Because phages replicate in vivo (in cells of living organism), a smaller effective dose can be used. On the other hand, this specificity is also a disadvantage: a phage will only kill a bacterium if it is a match to the specific strain. Consequently, phage mixtures are often applied to improve the chances of success, or samples can be taken and appropriate phages identified and grown.
Phages tend to be more successful than antibiotics where there is a biofilm covered by a polysaccharide layer, which antibiotics typically cannot penetrate. In the West, no therapies are currently authorized for use on humans.
Phages are currently being used therapeutically to treat bacterial infections that do not respond to conventional antibiotics, particularly in Russia and Georgia. There is also a phage therapy unit in Wrocław, Poland, established 2005, the only such centre in a European Union country.
The discovery of bacteriophages was reported by the Englishman Frederick Twort in 1915 and the French-Canadian Felix d’Hérelle in 1917. D’Hérelle said that the phages always appeared in the stools of Shigella dysentery patients shortly before they began to recover. He “quickly learned that bacteriophages are found wherever bacteria thrive: in sewers, in rivers that catch waste runoff from pipes, and in the stools of convalescent patients”. Phage therapy was immediately recognized by many to be a key way forward for the eradication of pathogenic bacterial infections. A Georgian, George Eliava, was making similar discoveries. He travelled to the Pasteur Institute in Paris where he met d’Hérelle, and in 1923 he founded the Eliava Institute in Tbilisi, Georgia, devoted to the development of phage therapy. Phage therapy is used in Russia, Georgia and Poland.
In Russia, extensive research and development soon began in this field. In the United States during the 1940s commercialization of phage therapy was undertaken by Eli Lilly and Company.
While knowledge was being accumulated regarding the biology of phages and how to use phage cocktails correctly, early uses of phage therapy were often unreliable. Since the early 20th century, research into the development of viable therapeutic antibiotics had also been underway, and by 1942 the antibiotic penicillin G had been successfully purified and saw use during the Second World War. The drug proved to be extraordinarily effective in the treatment of injured Allied soldiers whose wounds had become infected. By 1944, large-scale production of Penicillin had been made possible, and in 1945 it became publicly available in pharmacies. Due to the drug’s success, it was marketed widely in the U.S. and Europe, leading Western scientists to mostly lose interest in further use and study of phage therapy for some time.
Isolated from Western advances in antibiotic production in the 1940s, Russian scientists continued to develop already successful phage therapy to treat the wounds of soldiers in field hospitals. During World War II, the Soviet Union used bacteriophages to treat many soldiers infected with various bacterial diseases e.g. dysentery and gangrene. Russian researchers continued to develop and to refine their treatments and to publish their research and results. However, due to the scientific barriers of the Cold War, this knowledge was not translated and did not proliferate across the world. A summary of these publications was published in English in 2009 in “A Literature Review of the Practical Application of Bacteriophage Research”.
As a result of the development of antibiotic resistance since the 1950s and an advancement of scientific knowledge, there has been renewed interest worldwide in the ability of phage therapy to eradicate bacterial infections and chronic polymicrobial biofilm(including in industrial situations).
Phages have been investigated as a potential means to eliminate pathogens like Campylobacter in raw food and Listeria in fresh food or to reduce food spoilage bacteria. In agricultural practice phages were used to fight pathogens like Campylobacter, Escherichia and Salmonella in farm animals, Lactococcus and Vibriopathogens in fish from aquaculture and Erwinia and Xanthomonas in plants of agricultural importance. The oldest use was, however, in human medicine. Phages have been used against diarrheal diseases caused by E. coli, Shigella or Vibrio and against wound infections caused by facultative pathogens of the skin like staphylococci and streptococci. Recently the phage therapy approach has been applied to systemic and even intracellular infections and the addition of non-replicating phage and isolated phage enzymes like lysins to the antimicrobial arsenal. However, actual proof for the efficacy of these phage approaches in the field or the hospital is not available.
Some of the interest in the West can be traced back to 1994, when Soothill demonstrated (in an animal model) that the use of phages could improve the success of skin grafts by reducing the underlying Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Recent studies have provided additional support for these findings in the model system.
Although not “phage therapy” in the original sense, the use of phages as delivery mechanisms for traditional antibiotics constitutes another possible therapeutic use.The use of phages to deliver antitumor agents has also been described in preliminary in vitro experiments for cells in tissue culture.
In June 2015 the European Medicines Agency hosted a one-day workshop on the therapeutic use of bacteriophages and in July 2015 the National Institutes of Health (USA) hosted a two-day workshop “Bacteriophage Therapy: An Alternative Strategy to Combat Drug Resistance”.
Bacteriophage treatment offers a possible alternative to conventional antibiotic treatments for bacterial infection. It is conceivable that, although bacteria can develop resistance to phage, the resistance might be easier to overcome than resistance to antibiotics. Just as bacteria can evolve resistance, viruses can evolve to overcome resistance.
Bacteriophages are very specific, targeting only one or a few strains of bacteria. Traditional antibiotics have more wide-ranging effect, killing both harmful bacteria and useful bacteria such as those facilitating food digestion. The species and strain specificity of bacteriophages makes it unlikely that harmless or useful bacteria will be killed when fighting an infection.
A few research groups in the West are engineering a broader spectrum phage, and also a variety of forms of MRSA treatments, including impregnated wound dressings, preventative treatment for burn victims, phage-impregnated sutures.Enzybioticsare a new development at Rockefeller University that create enzymes from phage. Purified recombinant phage enzymes can be used as separate antibacterial agents in their own right.
The simplest method of phage treatment involves collecting local samples of water likely to contain high quantities of bacteria and bacteriophages, for example effluent outlets, sewage and other sources. The samples are taken and applied to the bacteria that are to be destroyed which have been cultured on growth medium.
If the bacteria die, as usually happens, the mixture is centrifuged; the phages collect on the top of the mixture and can be drawn off.
The phage solutions are then tested to see which ones show growth suppression effects (lysogeny) or destruction (lysis) of the target bacteria. The phage showing lysis are then amplified on cultures of the target bacteria, passed through a filter to remove all but the phages, then distributed.
Phages are “bacterium-specific” and it is therefore necessary in many cases to take a swab from the patient and culture it prior to treatment. Occasionally, isolation of therapeutic phages can require a few months to complete, but clinics generally keep supplies of phage cocktails for the most common bacterial strains in a geographical area.
Phage cocktails are sold in pharmacies in eastern countries. The composition of bacteriophagics cocktails has been periodically modified to add phages effective against emerging pathogenic strains.
Phages in practice are applied orally, topically on infected wounds or spread onto surfaces, or used during surgical procedures. Injection is rarely used, avoiding any risks of trace chemical contaminants that may be present from the bacteria amplification stage, and recognizing that the immune system naturally fights against viruses introduced into the bloodstream or lymphatic system.
In 2007 a Phase 1/2 clinical trial was completed at the Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections (otitis).Documentation of the Phase-1/Phase-2 study was published in August 2009 in the journal Clinical Otolaryngology.
Phase 1 clinical trials have now been completed in the Southwest Regional Wound Care Center, Lubbock, Texas for an approved cocktail of phages against bacteria, including P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (better known as E. coli). The cocktail of phages for the clinical trials was developed and supplied by Intralytix.
Reviews of phage therapy indicate that more clinical and microbiological research is needed to meet current standards.
Phages can usually be freeze-dried and turned into pills without materially reducing efficiency. Temperature stability up to 55 °C and shelf lives of 14 months have been shown for some types of phages in pill form.
Application in liquid form is possible, stored preferably in refrigerated vials.
Topical administration often involves application to gauzes that are laid on the area to be treated.
This article’s Criticism or Controversy section may compromise the article’s neutral point of view of the subject. (May 2015)
The high bacterial strain specificity of phage therapy may make it necessary for clinics to make different cocktails for treatment of the same infection or disease because the bacterial components of such diseases may differ from region to region or even person to person. In addition, this means that ‘banks’ containing many different phages must be kept and regularly updated with new phages.
Further, bacteria can evolve different receptors either before or during treatment; this can prevent phages from completely eradicating bacteria for as bacteria evolves, bacteriophages must evolve as well to keep up with the ever changing bacteria. In the case all bacteria is eliminated, the specific phage might evolve and attack good bacteria in the specific area of injection.
The need for banks of phages makes regulatory testing for safety harder and more expensive under current rules in most countries. Such a process would make difficult the large-scale use of phage therapy. Additionally, patent issues (specifically on living organisms) may complicate distribution for pharmaceutical companies wishing to have exclusive rights over their “invention”, which would discourage a commercial corporation from investing capital in this.
As has been known for at least thirty years, mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis have specific bacteriophages. No lytic phage has yet been discovered for Clostridium difficile, which is responsible for many nosocomial diseases, but some temperate phages (integrated in the genome, also called lysogenic) are known for this species; this opens encouraging avenues but with additional risks as discussed below.
Funding for phage therapy research and clinical trials is generally insufficient and difficult to obtain, since it is a lengthy and complex process to patent bacteriophage products. Scientists comment that ‘the biggest hurdle is regulatory’, whereas an official view is that individual phages would need proof individually because it would be too complicated to do as a combination, with many variables. Due to the specificity of phages, phage therapy would be most effective with a cocktail injection, which is generally rejected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Researchers and observers predict that for phage therapy to be successful the FDA must change its regulatory stance on combination drug cocktails. Public awareness and education about phage therapy are generally limited to scientific or independent research rather than mainstream media.
The negative public perception of viruses may also play a role in the reluctance to embrace phage therapy.
Approval of phage therapy for use in humans has not been given in Western countries with a few exceptions. In the United States, Washington and Oregon law allows naturopathic physicians to use any therapy that is legal any place in the world on an experimental basis, and in Texas phages are considered natural substances and can be used in addition to (but not as a replacement for) traditional therapy (they have been used routinely in a wound care clinic in Lubbock, TX, since 2006).
In 2013 “the 20th biennial Evergreen International Phage Meeting … conference drew 170 participants from 35 countries, including leaders of companies and institutes involved with human phage therapies from France, Australia, Georgia, Poland and the United States.”
Much of the difficulty in obtaining regulatory approval is proving to be the risks of using a self-replicating entity which has the capability to evolve.
As with antibiotic therapy and other methods of countering bacterial infections, endotoxins are released by the bacteria as they are destroyed within the patient (Herxheimer reaction). This can cause symptoms of fever; in extreme cases toxic shock (a problem also seen with antibiotics) is possible. Janakiraman Ramachandran argues that this complication can be avoided in those types of infection where this reaction is likely to occur by using genetically engineeredbacteriophages which have had their gene responsible for producing endolysin removed. Without this gene the host bacterium still dies but remains intact because the lysis is disabled. On the other hand, this modification stops the exponential growth of phages, so one administered phage means one dead bacterial cell. Eventually these dead cells are consumed by the normal house-cleaning duties of the phagocytes, which utilise enzymes to break down the whole bacterium and its contents into harmless proteins, polysaccharides and lipids.
Temperate (or Lysogenic) bacteriophages are not generally used therapeutically, as this group can act as a way for bacteria to exchange DNA; this can help spread antibiotic resistance or even, theoretically, make the bacteria pathogenic (see Cholera). Carl Merril claimed that harmless strains of corynebacterium may have been converted into C. diphtheriae that “probably killed a third of all Europeans who came to North America in the seventeenth century”. Fortunately, many phages seem to be lytic only with negligible probability of becoming lysogenic.
Brigham Young University has been researching the use of phage therapy to treat American foulbrood in honeybees. Phage therapy is also being investigated for potential applications in aquaculture.
The 2012 collection of military history essays about the changing role of women in warfare, “Women in War – from home front to front line” includes a chapter featuring phage therapy: “Chapter 17: Women who thawed the Cold War”.
- “Silent Killers: Fantastic Phages?”.
- McAuliffe et al. “The New Phage Biology: From Genomics to Applications” (introduction) in Mc Grath, S. and van Sinderen, D. (eds.) Bacteriophage: Genetics and Molecular Biology Caister Academic Press ISBN 978-1-904455-14-1
- Keen EC (2012). “Phage therapy: concept to cure”. Frontiers in Microbiology. 3: 238. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00238. PMC 3400130. PMID 22833738.
- Aguita M. “Combatting Bacterial Infection”. LabNews.co.uk. Archived from the original on 28 February 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2009.
- Pirisi A (October 2000). “Phage therapy–advantages over antibiotics?”. Lancet. 356 (9239): 1418. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74059-9. PMID 11052592.
- “Eaters of bacteria: Is phage therapy ready for the big time?”. Discover Magazine. 2011-05-20. Retrieved 2013-04-12.
- BBC Horizon: Phage — The Virus that Cures 1997-10-09
- Parfitt T (2005). “Georgia: an unlikely stronghold for bacteriophage therapy”. Lancet. 365 (9478): 2166–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66759-1. PMID 15986542.
- Thiel K (January 2004). “Old dogma, new tricks–21st Century phage therapy”. Nature Biotechnology. 22 (1): 31–6. doi:10.1038/nbt0104-31. PMID 14704699.
- “IITD PAN Wrocław -“. www.iitd.pan.wroc.pl.
- Twort, F.W. (1915). “An investigation on the nature of ultra-microscopic viruses”. The Lancet. 186 (4814): 1241–1243. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)20383-3.
- D’Herelle F (1917). “Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysenteriques” [An invisible microbe that is antagonistic to the dysentery bacillus]. Comptes Rendus (in French). 165: 373–375.
- Shasha SM, Sharon N, Inbar M (February 2004). “[Bacteriophages as antibacterial agents]”. Harefuah (in Hebrew). 143 (2): 121–5, 166. PMID 15143702.
- Häusler (2006, ch. 1, at the limits of medicine)
- Kuchment (2012, p. 11)
- Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G, Alavidze Z, Gogokhia L, Kuhl S, Abedon ST (January 2010). “Phage therapy in clinical practice: treatment of human infections”. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 11 (1): 69–86. doi:10.2174/138920110790725401. PMID 20214609.
- Hanlon GW (August 2007). “Bacteriophages: an appraisal of their role in the treatment of bacterial infections”. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 30(2): 118–28. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.04.006. PMID 17566713.
- Stone, Richard (25 October 2002). “Stalin’s forgotten cure” (PDF). Science. 298 (5594): 728–731.
- Summers WC (2001). “Bacteriophage therapy”. Annual Review of Microbiology. 55: 437–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.437. PMID 11544363.
- Nina Chanishvili, 2009, “A Literature Review of the Practical Application of Bacteriophage Research”, 184p.
- Kuchment, Anna (2011); Häusler, Thomas (2006)
- “KERA Think! Podcast: Viruses are Everywhere!”. 2011-06-16. Retrieved 2012-06-04. (audio)
- Mangen MJ, Havelaar AH, Poppe KP, de Wit GA (August 2007). “Cost-utility analysis to control Campylobacter on chicken meat: dealing with data limitations”. Risk Analysis. 27 (4): 815–30. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00925.x. PMID 17958494.
- Mc Grath S, Sinderen D, eds. (2007). Bacteriophage: Genetics and Molecular Biology (1st ed.). Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-14-1. .
- Soothill, J.S. (1994). “Bacteriophage prevents destruction of skin grafts by Pseudomonas aeruginosa”. Burns. 20 (3): 209–211. doi:10.1016/0305-4179(94)90184-8.
- McVay CS, Velásquez M, Fralick JA (June 2007). “Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn wound model”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 51 (6): 1934–8. doi:10.1128/AAC.01028-06. PMC 1891379. PMID 17387151.
- Yacoby I, Bar H, Benhar I (June 2007). “Targeted drug-carrying bacteriophages as antibacterial nanomedicines”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 51(6): 2156–63. doi:10.1128/AAC.00163-07. PMC 1891362. PMID 17404004.
- Yacoby I, Shamis M, Bar H, Shabat D, Benhar I (June 2006). “Targeting antibacterial agents by using drug-carrying filamentous bacteriophages”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 50 (6): 2087–97. doi:10.1128/AAC.00169-06. PMC 1479106. PMID 16723570.
- Bar H, Yacoby I, Benhar I (April 2008). “Killing cancer cells by targeted drug-carrying phage nanomedicines”. BMC Biotechnology. 8: 37. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-8-37. PMC 2323368. PMID 18387177.
- “European Medicines Agency – News and Events – Workshop on the therapeutic use of bacteriophages”. www.ema.europa.eu.
- “Bacteriophage Therapy: An Alternative Strategy to Combat Drug Resistance”. respond.niaid.nih.gov.
- Górski A, Miedzybrodzki R, Borysowski J, Weber-Dabrowska B, Lobocka M, Fortuna W, Letkiewicz S, Zimecki M, Filby G (August 2009). “Bacteriophage therapy for the treatment of infections”. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs. 10(8): 766–74. PMID 19649921.
- “What is Phage Therapy?”. phagetherapycenter.com. Retrieved 2014-11-29.
- “Phage Therapy: Past History and Future Prospects” (PDF).
- Abedon ST (2012). Salutary contributions of viruses to medicine and public health. In: Witzany G (ed). Viruses: Essential Agents of Life. Springer. 389-405. ISBN 978-94-007-4898-9.
- Duckworth DH, Gulig PA (2002). “Bacteriophages: potential treatment for bacterial infections”. BioDrugs. 16 (1): 57–62. doi:10.2165/00063030-200216010-00006. PMID 11909002.
- “Scientists Engineer Viruses To Battle Bacteria”.
- Borysowski J, Weber-Dabrowska B, Górski A (April 2006). “Bacteriophage endolysins as a novel class of antibacterial agents”. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 231 (4): 366–77. PMID 16565432.
- Efrony R, Atad I, Rosenberg E (February 2009). “Phage therapy of coral white plague disease: properties of phage BA3”. Current Microbiology. 58 (2): 139–45. doi:10.1007/s00284-008-9290-x. PMID 18923867.
- McCallin S, Alam Sarker S, Barretto C, Sultana S, Berger B, Huq S, Krause L, Bibiloni R, Schmitt B, Reuteler G, Brüssow H (September 2013). “Safety analysis of a Russian phage cocktail: from metagenomic analysis to oral application in healthy human subjects”. Virology. 443 (2): 187–96. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.022. PMID 23755967.
- Abedon ST, Kuhl SJ, Blasdel BG, Kutter EM (March 2011). “Phage treatment of human infections”. Bacteriophage. 1 (2): 66–85. doi:10.4161/bact.1.2.15845. PMC 3278644. PMID 22334863.
- Villarroel J, Larsen MV, Kilstrup M, Nielsen M (November 2017). “Metagenomic Analysis of Therapeutic PYO Phage Cocktails from 1997 to 2014”. Viruses. 9(11): 328. doi:10.3390/v9110328. PMC 5707535. PMID 29099783.
- “Press & News”. Archived from the original on 30 November 2007. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
- “biocontrol.ltd.uk”. Archived from the original on 15 April 2009. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
- “biocontrol-ltd.com”. Archived from the original on 26 May 2008. Retrieved 30 April 2008.
- Wright A, Hawkins CH, Anggård EE, Harper DR (August 2009). “A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy”. Clinical Otolaryngology. 34 (4): 349–57. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01973.x. PMID 19673983.
- Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Kuskowski MA, Wolcott BM, Ward LS, Sulakvelidze A (June 2009). “Bacteriophage therapy of venous leg ulcers in humans: results of a phase I safety trial”. Journal of Wound Care. 18 (6): 237–8, 240–3. doi:10.12968/jowc.2009.18.6.42801. PMID 19661847.
- Brüssow H (July 2005). “Phage therapy: the Escherichia coli experience”. Microbiology. 151 (Pt 7): 2133–40. doi:10.1099/mic.0.27849-0. PMID 16000704.
- “Novel Phage Therapy Saves Patient with Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infection – UC San Diego Health”. 25 April 2017.
- Graham F. HATFULL 12 – Mycobacteriophages : Pathogenesis and Applications, pages 238-255 (in Waldor, M.K., D.I. Friedman, and S.L. Adhya, Phages: Their role in bacterial pathogenesis and biotechnology, 2005, University of Michigan; Sankar L. Adhya, National Institutes of Health: ASM Press).
- Brüssow H (2007). “Phage Therapy: The Western Perspective”. In McGrath S, van Sinderen D. Bacteriophage: Genetics and Molecular Biology. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-14-1.
- Verbeken G, De Vos D, Vaneechoutte M, Merabishvili M, Zizi M, Pirnay JP (October 2007). “European regulatory conundrum of phage therapy”. Future Microbiology. 2 (5): 485–91. doi:10.2217/174609126.96.36.1995. PMID 17927471.
- Faltys D (4 August 2013), “Evergreen Researcher Dr. Kutter Announces ‘There’s a Phage for That‘“, Thurston Talk, Olympia, Washington, retrieved 2015-03-01
- Kuchment (2011, ch. 12, pp. 115-118): In addition to mentioning that Texas law allows physicians to use “natural substances” like phages in addition to (but not in lieu of) standard medical practice, Kuichment says, “In June 2009 [Dr. Randall Wolcott’s] study was published in the Journal of Wound Care.”
- December 2013 Faculty Spotlight, Olympia, WA: Evergreen College, December 2013, retrieved 2015-03-01
- “Evergreen PHAGE THERAPY: BACTERIOPHAGES AS ANTIBIOTICS”. Archived from the original on 2 March 2007.
- “Stone, Richard. “Stalin’s Forgotten Cure.” Science Online 282 (25 October 2002)”. Archived from the original on 4 July 2008.
- Fox SI (1999). Human Physiology -6th ed. McGraw-Hill. pp. : 50, 55, 448, 449. ISBN 978-0-697-34191-4.
- Kuchement (2011, p. 94)
- Kuchement (2011, ch. 6, p. 63): “[T]he Hirszfeld Institute [in Poland] has almost always done its research studies in the absence of double-bind controls … . But the sheer quantity of cases, combined with the fact that nearly all the cases involve patients who failed to respond to antibiotics, is persuasive.”
- “Bee Killers: Using Phages Against Deadly Honeybee Diseases”. youtube.com. Retrieved 2014-11-29.
- “Using microscopic bugs to save the bees”. news.byu.edu. 2018-07-20. Retrieved 2014-12-01.
- Stolworthy, Lauren (May 6, 2016). “BYU’s bee team successfully treats honeybee loss”. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
- Richards GP (2014). “Bacteriophage remediation of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture: a review of the technology”. Bacteriophage. 4 (4): e975540. doi:10.4161/21597081.2014.975540. PMC 4590005. PMID 26713223.
- Summers, William C. (1991). “On the Origins of the Science in Arrowsmith: Paul de Kruif, Felix d’Herelle, and Phage”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 46 (3): 315–332. doi:10.1093/jhmas/46.3.315.
- “Phage Findings”. Time. 1938-01-03. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
- “SparkNotes: Arrowsmith: Chapters 31–33”. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
- “Churchill the Wartime Feminist”. 3 June 2012.
- iBiology video: Phage Therapy (2016)
- Elkadi, Omar Anwar (2014). “Phage therapy: The new old antibacterial therapy”. El Mednifico Journal. 2 (3): 311. doi:10.18035/emj.v2i3.202.
- Popular Science: The Next Phage (2009)
- Thiel K (January 2004). “Old dogma, new tricks–21st Century phage therapy”. Nature Biotechnology. 22 (1): 31–6. doi:10.1038/nbt0104-31. PMID 14704699.
Enzybiotics are an experimental antibiotic approach employing enzymes to combat pathogenic bacterial infections. The name is a combination of the words “enzyme” and “antibiotics” first coined in March 2001 by Nelson et al. Many of the enzymes used as enzybiotics are lysins, enzymes derived from bacterial viruses (or bacteriophages) used to release progeny bacteriophage from infected bacteria, though other natural or synthetic enzymes may be used.
Enzybiotic approaches have attempted to incorporate bacteriophage-derived lysins to kill bacterial cells. One particular lysin, isolated from phage P68 of Staphylococcus aureus, has shown antimicrobial activity against its host species when used along with the antibiotic gentamicin.
- Nelson,, D; Loomis, L; Fischetti, VA (March 2001). “Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (7): 4107–12. doi:10.1073/pnas.061038398. PMC 31187. PMID 11259652.
- Veiga-Crespo, P; Ageitos, JM; Poza, M; Villa, TG (August 2007). “Enzybiotics: a look to the future, recalling the past”. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 96 (8): 1917–24. doi:10.1002/jps.20853. PMID 17518365.
- Veiga-Crespo, P. and Villa, T. G. (2009) Phylogeny of Enzybiotics, in Enzybiotics: Antibiotic Enzymes as Drugs and Therapeutics (eds T. G. Villa and P. Veiga-Crespo), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi:10.1002/9780470570548.ch4
- Hermoso, JA; García, JL; García, P (October 2007). “Taking aim on bacterial pathogens: from phage therapy to enzybiotics”. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 10 (5): 461–72. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2007.08.002. PMID 17904412.
- Pastagia, M; Schuch, R; Fischetti, VA; Huang, D. (October 2013). “Lysins: the arrival of pathogen-directed anti-infectives”. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 62: 1506–15. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.061028-0.
- Manoharadas, S; Witte, A; Bläsi, U (2009-01-01). “Antimicrobial activity of a chimeric enzybiotic towards Staphylococcus aureus”. Journal of Biotechnology. 139 (1): 118–23. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.09.003. PMID 18940209.